Abstract
PURPOSE Long-term shifts in specialty choice and health workforce policy have raised concern about the future of primary care in the United States. The objective of this study was to examine current use of primary and specialty care across the US population for policy-relevant subgroups, such as disadvantaged populations and persons with chronic illness.
METHODS Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2004 were analyzed using a probability sample patients or other participants from the noninstitutionalized US population in 2004 (N = 34,403). The main and secondary outcome measures were the estimates of the proportion of Americans who accessed different types of primary care and specialty physicians and midlevel practitioners, as well as the fraction of ambulatory visits accounted for by the different clinician types. Data were disaggregated by income, health insurance status, race/ethnicity, rural or urban residence, and presence of 5 common chronic diseases.
RESULTS Family physicians were the most common clinician type accessed by adults, seniors, and reproductive-age women, and they were second to pediatricians for children. Disadvantaged adults with 3 markers of disadvantage (poverty, disadvantaged minority, uninsured) received 45.6% (95% CI, 40.4%–50.7%) of their ambulatory visits from family physicians vs 30.5% (95% CI, 30.0%–32.1%) for adults with no markers. For children with 3 vs 0 markers of disadvantage, the proportion of visits from family physicians roughly doubled from 16.5% (95% CI, 14.4%–18.6%) to 30.1% (95% CI, 18.8%–41.2%). Family physicians constitute the only clinician group that does not show income disparities in access. Multivariate analyses show that patterns of access to family physicians and nurse-practitioners are more equitable than for other clinician types.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care clinicians, especially family physicians, deliver a disproportionate share of ambulatory care to disadvantaged populations. A diminished primary care workforce will leave considerable gaps in US health care equity. Health care workforce policy should reflect this important population-level function of primary care.
- Received for publication May 4, 2007.
- Revision received August 1, 2007.
- Accepted for publication August 8, 2007.
- © 2007 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Not all healthcare inequities in diabetes are equal: a comparison of two medically underserved cohorts
- Community Health Workers as Trust Builders and Healers: A Cohort Study in Primary Care
- Primary Care Providers in California and Florida Report Low Confidence in Providing Type 1 Diabetes Care
- Most Uninsured Adults Could Schedule Primary Care Appointments Before The ACA, But Average Price Was $160
- Measuring Capability for Healthy Diet and Physical Activity
- The strength of primary care systems
- Electronic Health Records vs Medicaid Claims: Completeness of Diabetes Preventive Care Data in Community Health Centers
- Racial Differences in Primary Care Opioid Risk Reduction Strategies
- Health Care Reform and Equity: Promise, Pitfalls, and Prescriptions
- Capability and Clinical Success
- Context for Understanding the National Demonstration Project and the Patient-Centered Medical Home
- Primary Care Provider Views of the Current Referral-to-Eye-Care Process: Focus Group Results
- A Medical Assistant-Based Program to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Primary Care
- The Paradox of Primary Care
- Delivery of Survivorship Care by Primary Care Physicians: The Perspective of Breast Cancer Patients
- No Job Is Finished Until the Electronic Work Is Done
- In This Issue: Equity Global Theme Issue on Poverty and Human Development
- Recruiting Primary Care Physicians From Abroad: Is Poaching From Low-Income Countries Morally Defensible?